The International Research Journal of Management Science

The International Research Journal of Management Science (IRJM) is a double-blind peer review journal published annually by Nepal College of Management on each December. We have adopted a double anonymous peer review model, with reviewers invited by the editorial team of journal.

Before being published, articles go through a rigorous examination conducted by our in-house editorial team to ensure they align with our reporting standards. Our pre-publication assessment process encompasses the following elements:

Author Eligibility: To be eligible for publication, at least one of the authors must be a qualified academic, professional, or policy maker affiliated with a recognized research institution or a reputable public sector organization.

Article Types: We consider article types such as research papers, case studies, and concept papers.

Readability: Since we do not provide copyediting services, the language and overall readability of the articles must meet a standard that allows readers to easily comprehend the content.

Plagiarism Issues: We employ plagiarism detection tools to thoroughly scrutinize articles for any instances of plagiarism before they are published.

Methods Section Review: Our team carefully assesses the completeness of the methods and resources section to ensure that sufficient details are provided. This ensures that readers and potential reviewers can properly evaluate the work, and we may request additional information if necessary, for the reproducibility of the research.

Reviewer’s eligibility

Reviewers are chosen based on their subject matter expertise. To identify potential reviewers, we utilize information available on university websites and research databases, allowing us to connect with scholars for review requests. Our editorial team meticulously evaluates and selects reviewers to ensure they meet our established reviewer criteria.

We hold the contributions of our reviewers in high regard and consider it crucial to recognize and appreciate the time and dedication they invest in evaluating research papers. Peer review remains an invaluable contribution to the scientific community, and we are dedicated to expressing our gratitude for their pivotal role in this process. To gain a deeper understanding of our approach, please consult the provided link.

Peer reviewer’s code of conduct

The peer review process serves as a cornerstone of scholarly publishing, ensuring the integrity, quality, and credibility of academic work. At IRJM Research, we deeply appreciate the significant time, effort, and expertise that reviewers bring to this essential task. To uphold the highest standards and ensure that the peer review process is constructive and adds value for authors, readers, and fellow reviewers, we kindly ask reviewers to:

• Thoroughly Examine the Article: Please read the full article, including all associated figures, tables, and data.
• Be Comprehensive: Your peer review report should comprehensively discuss the article and its individual aspects, demonstrating your deep understanding of the content.
• Provide Specific Feedback: Your comments should be as detailed as possible, and when appropriate, include references to aid authors in fully addressing the issues raised.
• Offer Constructive Criticism: Feel free to include any concerns or criticisms you may have in your review, but kindly do so in a constructive and respectful manner.
• Maintain a Respectful Tone: Review the article as you would want to be reviewed and focus your comments on the scientific content of the article in question, rather than making pejorative remarks about the authors themselves.

Guideline for reviewing the paper

Initially, we send an email to individuals who are experts in a specific field related to the paper, seeking their consent to conduct a review. We also inquire about their availability to provide feedback within a designated timeframe. If the reviewer demonstrates the ability to effectively manage their time and commit to providing feedback, the paper will be forwarded to them for review. We have devised a review format based on the guideline prescribed by UGC Nepal that will be sent to the assigned reviewer. However, we send the research subject and abstract for review at first, and the full manuscript will be delivered if the reviewer feels comfortable providing feedback.